linux-kernel - Re: MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:17:41 +0400
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions
 when reliable operation is possible)

Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2009-08-27 12:54:05, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[]
>> Only md/raid1 supports barriers at present, it seems.  None of the other  
>> MD drivers support barriers.
> 
> Not even md/raid0? Ouch :-(.

Only for raid1 there's no requiriment for inter-drive ordering.  Hence
only raid1 supports barriers (and gained that support very recently,
in 1 or 2 kernel releases).  For the rest, including raid0 and linear,
inter-drive ordering is necessary to implement barriers.  Or md should
have its own queue (flushing) mechanisms.

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/