[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <661de9470909021256i569261bxbe1523d8e37b5b14@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:26:18 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix fake numa on ppc
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
>> Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
>> a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
>>
>> # cat node0/cpulist
>>
>> # cat node1/cpulist
>>
>> ...
>> # cat node6/cpulist
>>
>> # cat node7/cpulist
>> 0-7
>>
>> Presently, just fixing the cpu association issue with ppc, as explained
>> in my previous mail.
>>
>
> Right, I'm proposing an alternate mapping scheme (which we've used for
> years) for both platforms such that a cpu is bound (and is set in
> cpumask_of_node()) to each fake node with which it has physical affinity.
> That is the only way for zonelist ordering in node order, task migration
> from offlined cpus, correct sched domains, etc. I can propose a patchset
> for x86_64 to do exactly this if there aren't any objections and I hope
> you'll help do ppc.
Sounds interesting, I'd definitely be interested in seeing your
proposal, but I would think of that as additional development on top
of this patch
Balbir Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists