linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ca183d6e3843acdd930c8854cf7d70bc@coraid.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:16:18 -0400
From:	Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ecashin@...aid.com,
	bonbons@...ux-vserver.org, apw@...onical.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly

On Wed Sep  2 15:55:47 EDT 2009, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:15:20 -0400
> Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com> wrote:
> 
> > The patch looks fine to me.
> 
> I translated that into Acked-by:.
> 
> > I don't think it should go in my aoe tree for linux-next, since the
> > patch addresses a regression.
> > 
> > Based on the series file in mmotm, I don't think this patch is in mm
> > at the moment.  Andrew Morton, do you think this patch should go
> > through your mm tree?
> 
> I have it now.  Please check that the below is the right patch and that
> my cobbled-together changelog makes sense (if not, please send
> replacement changelog and/or patch).

Thanks.  It looks good to me.

-- 
  Ed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/