[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9EDEF6.2000002@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:09:10 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>,
"lkml, " <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: methods of sched event tracing and my assumptions
Darren Hart wrote:
>
> After some gentle resistance to CVS and non-single-file testcases, I
> prepared a standalone prio-wake-min.c. It ran to completion on linus
> with slightly fewer wakeups than the LTP version (I removed a number of
> things that weren't strictly necessary for this specific exercise), png
> attached. It's hung part way through the scripts on rt though. I'll be
> looking into that, but in case you prefer to look at this version, it is
> available here:
>
> http://dvhart.com/darren/linux/prio-wake-min.c
I have just now updated this test to fix a possible race when using a
requeue PI enabled glibc (likely a bug in glibc) which also reduces the
tests runtime from 1s to about 15ms (yeah, the sleep loops were rather
stupid in the original version :/).
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists