linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ubifs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090902153657.dc174bf6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:36:57 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ubifs tree

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/ubifs/super.c between commit 887ee17117fd23e962332b353d250ac9e090b20f
("UBIFS: remove unneeded call from ubifs_sync_fs") from the ubifs tree
and commit 0184fca792940a9e4058b2c63b3f334326a4c7af ("writeback: move
super_block argument to struct writeback_control") from the block tree.

The former removes the code that the latter changes.  I just used the
version from the ubifs tree.  I can carry this fixup as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped