[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090902060743.GA15101@chram.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:07:43 +0200
From: Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi@...ox.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.30.5] Diagnosing an IDE lockup with SMART long tests
Quoting Robert Hancock:
> It's most likely a bug in the IDE code somewhere, but realistically the
> most effective course of action would likely be to switch from the old IDE
> drivers and use libata instead. The IDE code doesn't receive that much
> testing these days, and it's really hard to debug (as you've seen, the
> debugging output is rather atrocious).
Sure, but we're talking a production machine here. Moving to libata to
handle the IDE drives would involve many changes everywhere in the system
and cause instability. For instance, /etc/fstab would need to refer to
/dev/sd*, /etc/mdadm.conf needs rewriting as well... This is a complex move,
and there's no assurance that libata won't have bugs in its PATA handling.
Since the machine is otherwise stable, I'm rather aiming at a workaround.
Today, the workaround I have is to not run SMART long tests but it proved
dangerous. Therefore, I'm looking for a kernel workaround to avoid the
lockups.
Why would the reading of the status register of the IDE interface cause a
lockup? If I can prevent the lockup and resume work, I would not mind having
a few lost interrupts events now and then.
Raphael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists