[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090902080346.GB3806@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:33:46 +0530
From: Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix fake numa on ppc
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:37:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
> > on ppc:
> >
> > 1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
> > boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
> > different real nodes.
> >
>
> On x86_64, we can use numa=off to completely disable NUMA so that all
> memory and all cpus are mapped to a single node 0. That's an extreme
> example of the above and is totally permissible.
>
> > 2) The cpu association is broken. On a JS22 blade for example, which is
> > a 2-node numa machine, I get the following:
> >
> > # cat /proc/cmdline
> > root=/dev/sda6 numa=fake=2G,4G,,6G,8G,10G,12G,14G,16G
> > # cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
> > 0-3
> > # cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpulist
> > 4-7
> > # cat /sys/devices/system/node/node4/cpulist
> >
> > #
> >
>
> This doesn't show what the true NUMA topology of the machine is, could you
> please post the output of
>
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpulist
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance
> $ ls -d /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpu[0-8]
>
> from a normal boot without any numa=fake?
>
Heres the output as requested by you:
# ls /sys/devices/system/node/
has_cpu has_normal_memory node0 node1 online possible
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpulist
0-3
4-7
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance
10 20
20 10
# ls -d /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpu[0-8]
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu0 /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu3
/sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpu6
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu1 /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpu4
/sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpu7
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu2 /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpu5
> > So, though the cpus 4-7 should have been associated with node4, they
> > still belong to node1. The patch works by recording a real numa node
> > boundary and incrementing the fake node count. At the same time, a
> > mapping is stored from the real numa node to the first fake node that
> > gets created on it.
> >
>
> If there are multiple fake nodes on a real physical node, all cpus in that
> node should appear in the cpulist for each fake node for which it has
> local distance.
Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
# cat node0/cpulist
# cat node1/cpulist
...
# cat node6/cpulist
# cat node7/cpulist
0-7
Presently, just fixing the cpu association issue with ppc, as explained
in my previous mail.
--
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists