linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: CONFIG_NO_HZ could cause software timeouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e5e476b0909030422m745af2e6mb8dd0148c2341e9d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:22:57 +0200
From:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
To:	Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@...valley.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: CONFIG_NO_HZ could cause software timeouts

Is XIP enabled? It seems that the xip_udelay is not very accurate, and
may be the cause of what you are seeing.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Norbert van
Bolhuis<nvbolhuis@...valley.nl> wrote:
>
> The problem occurs when e.g. drivers use time_after(jiffes, timeout).
>
> CONFIG_NO_HZ could make jiffies advance by more than 1.
> This is done by:
> tick_nohz_update_jiffies->tick_do_update_jiffies64->do_timer
>
> If drivers use a timeout value of jiffies+1,
> "time_after(jiffies, timeout)" will be true after 1 interrupt
> (given that it advances jiffies by at least 2).
>
> This is exactly what happens in cfi_cmdset_0002.c:do_write_buffer
> for our case (Powerpc MPC8313, linux-2.6.28, CONFIG_HZ=250, CONFIG_NO_HZ=y).
>
> do_write_buffer does the following:
>  unsigned long uWriteTimeout = ( HZ / 1000 ) + 1;
>  ...
>  timeo = jiffies + uWriteTimeout;
>  ...
>  for (;;) {
>  ...
>  if (time_after(jiffies, timeo) && !chip_ready(map, adr))
>   break;
>  if (chip_ready(map, adr)) {
>   xip_enable(map, chip, adr);
>   goto op_done;
>  }
>  UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
>  }
>  /* software timeout */
>  ret = -EIO;
> opdone:
>  ...
>
> I've seen a few software timeouts after the for-loop
> looped only 13 times (= 13 us delay, i.s.o. the expected 1 ms). Typically
> our NOR flash (S29GL01GP) may need upto ~ 200 us to be ready.
>
> disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ fixes the problem.
> replacing time_after by a for-loop counter to loop max 1000 times
> also fixes the problem.
>
> the latest kernel seems to have the same problem.
>
> do I miss something here or is this a known problem of CONFIG_NO_HZ ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-- 
__________________________________________________________________________

dott. Corrado Zoccolo                          mailto:czoccolo@...il.com
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average
man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls
that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and
calls that humbleness.
                               Tales of Power - C. Castaneda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/