[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251985948-28965-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] core: allow setrlimit to non-current tasks
Just for clarity. The current patch looks like this:
--
Add locking to allow setrlimit accept task parameter other than
current.
Namely, lock tasklist_lock for read and check whether the task
structure has sighand non-null. Do all the signal processing under
that lock still held. We do this only for non-current tasks.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/sys.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index ed500c8..85d5d4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
struct rlimit *new_rlim)
{
struct rlimit *old_rlim;
+ unsigned int needs_locking = !same_thread_group(tsk, current);
int retval;
if (new_rlim->rlim_cur > new_rlim->rlim_max)
@@ -1247,13 +1248,24 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && new_rlim->rlim_max > sysctl_nr_open)
return -EPERM;
+ /* optimization: 'current' doesn't need locking, e.g. setrlimit */
+ if (needs_locking) {
+ /* protect tsk->signal and tsk->sighand from disappearing */
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ if (!tsk->sighand) {
+ retval = -ESRCH;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
old_rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource;
if ((new_rlim->rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
- return -EPERM;
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+ retval = -EPERM;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim);
if (retval)
- return retval;
+ goto unlock;
if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU && new_rlim->rlim_cur == 0) {
/*
@@ -1283,7 +1295,11 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
update_rlimit_cpu(tsk, new_rlim->rlim_cur);
out:
- return 0;
+ retval = 0;
+unlock:
+ if (needs_locking)
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ return retval;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int, resource, struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists