lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu,  3 Sep 2009 15:52:28 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	oleg@...hat.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] core: allow setrlimit to non-current tasks

Just for clarity. The current patch looks like this:
--
Add locking to allow setrlimit accept task parameter other than
current.

Namely, lock tasklist_lock for read and check whether the task
structure has sighand non-null. Do all the signal processing under
that lock still held. We do this only for non-current tasks.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sys.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index ed500c8..85d5d4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
 		struct rlimit *new_rlim)
 {
 	struct rlimit *old_rlim;
+	unsigned int needs_locking = !same_thread_group(tsk, current);
 	int retval;
 
 	if (new_rlim->rlim_cur > new_rlim->rlim_max)
@@ -1247,13 +1248,24 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
 	if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && new_rlim->rlim_max > sysctl_nr_open)
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	/* optimization: 'current' doesn't need locking, e.g. setrlimit */
+	if (needs_locking) {
+		/* protect tsk->signal and tsk->sighand from disappearing */
+		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+		if (!tsk->sighand) {
+			retval = -ESRCH;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+	}
 	old_rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource;
 	if ((new_rlim->rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
-	    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
-		return -EPERM;
+	    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+		retval = -EPERM;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim);
 	if (retval)
-		return retval;
+		goto unlock;
 
 	if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU && new_rlim->rlim_cur == 0) {
 		/*
@@ -1283,7 +1295,11 @@ int setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
 
 	update_rlimit_cpu(tsk, new_rlim->rlim_cur);
 out:
-	return 0;
+	retval = 0;
+unlock:
+	if (needs_locking)
+		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	return retval;
 }
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int, resource, struct rlimit __user *, rlim)
-- 
1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ