[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090903175617.GA26346@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:56:18 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liml@....ca, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Make DISCARD_BARRIER and DISCARD_NOBARRIER writes
instead of reads
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:52:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:03 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > The commands are conceptually writes, and in the case of IDE and SCSI
> > commands actually are writes. They were only reads because we thought
> > that would interact better with the elevators. Now the elevators know
> > about discard requests, that advantage no longer exists.
>
> Can you drop the final sentence of that? It isn't true, and I never said
> it.
No, but you wouldn't give me a changelog entry, so I had to make
something up.
> s/. Now.*/, but that isn't necessary, and making them writes makes it
> easier for the low-level IDE and SCSI code to cope with the fact that
> the command has to be sent with a payload./
Thanks.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists