[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090903064716.GA14911@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:47:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Introduce new
(non-)paranoia level to allow raw tracepoint access
* Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > static inline bool perf_paranoid_cpu(void)
> > {
> > return sysctl_perf_counter_paranoid > 0;
> > @@ -3971,6 +3977,7 @@ static const struct pmu *tp_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
> > * have these.
> > */
> > if ((counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) &&
> > + && perf_paranoid_tracepoint_raw() &&
>
> "&& &&"
>
> This leads to build failure.
Yeah - fixed that yesterday, forgot to push out :-/
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists