linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: tip tree build warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090903083844.GA9912@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:38:44 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: tip tree build warnings


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these warning:
> 
> In file included from include/trace/ftrace.h:285,
>                  from include/trace/define_trace.h:61,
>                  from include/trace/events/timer.h:342,
>                  from kernel/timer.c:50:
> include/trace/events/timer.h: In function 'ftrace_raw_output_itimer_state':
> include/trace/events/timer.h:280: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'cputime_t'
> include/trace/events/timer.h: In function 'ftrace_raw_output_itimer_expire':
> include/trace/events/timer.h:317: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'cputime_t'

Should be harmless with no runtime effects - the fix would be to 
harmonize the cputime_t types across architectures.

> Introduced by commit 3f0a525ebf4b8ef041a332bbe4a73aee94bb064b ("timers: Add tracepoints for itimer") from the tip tree.
> 
> cputime_t is variously "u64", "unsigned long long" and "unsigned 
> long" on different architectures.

Should be unsigned long i think. Most architectures use it as 
unsigned long via include/asm-generic/cputime.h, except these three:

 arch/ia64/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef u64 cputime_t;
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef u64 cputime_t;
 arch/s390/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef unsigned long long cputime_t;

Or we could eliminate the type altogether as well and standardize on 
u64. Thomas?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/