[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090904104324.GA10807@linux>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:43:25 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair
task groups
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:19:50PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> +config CFS_HARD_LIMITS
> + bool "Hard Limits for CFS Group Scheduler"
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
Shouldn't depend also on CGROUPS and CGROUP_SCHED? without them hard
limits can't be defined, right?
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 71868a0..19c0290 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ config FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
config CFS_HARD_LIMITS
bool "Hard Limits for CFS Group Scheduler"
depends on EXPERIMENTAL
- depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+ depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && CGROUPS && CGROUP_SCHED
default n
help
This option enables hard limiting of CPU time obtained by
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists