[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA13FE6.20807@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:27:18 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, sam@...nborg.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
David.Woodhouse@...el.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/kbuild] x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in
'make oldconfig'
On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
>>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig'
>>
>> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build:
>>
>> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52:
>> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory
>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
>> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop.
>> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>
> Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86?
>
Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists