[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090904190345.02733404@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:03:45 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: Add boot_timesource sysfs
attribute
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:55:49 +0100
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
> > that's ok, but nonetheless there's a problem in hwclock
> > if it takes 3 secs to read the time.
>
> The 3-second case is with virtualised access to the cmos, but you're
> right that it does sound excessive. Even so, it seems like a win to be
> able to avoid running code that the kernel's already run
ok. I find boot_timesource to be not intuitive. I'd
vote for hctosys or something like that.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists