[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA13B14.20000@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:06:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, stable@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/i386: Make sure stack-protector segment base
is cache aligned
On 09/04/2009 07:15 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> the other issue is that afaik we want the kernel to use the other
> register than userspace does...
>
Yes, although it's a pretty marginal win on 32 bits as far as I know.
On 64 bits, not so.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists