[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090905095736.GA5005@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:57:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/cpu] x86, msr: change msr-reg.o to obj-y, and export
its symbols
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:06:47PM +0000, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> x86, msr: change msr-reg.o to obj-y, and export its symbols
>
> Change msr-reg.o to obj-y (it will be included in virtually every
> kernel since it is used by the initialization code for AMD processors)
Yeah, about that, I'm wondering whether a more fine grained
Kconfig suboptions would be appropriate here. Currently,
<arch/x86/kernel/cpu/{intel,amd}.c> are sprinkled with the
if (c->x86 == XX) { apply quirks }
thingies and we could put those into their own files which are
built/linked only when enabled. Before that, you would have chosen
the CPU vendor and the CPU family thus pulling only the related
quirks/fixes. Distros will of course need to enable all of them. Then,
all those different families quirks should be iterated over in a manner
similar to the initcall mechanism.
Anyways, just an idea - it could be dumb overengineering but on a
first glance it will organize/simplify the quirks code, reduce kernel
image proper, get rid of Kconfig options like CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG,
vendor-specific cpuinfo_x86 members like fdiv_bug, f00f_bug, coma_bug,
and [add another good reason here :)].
Comments?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists