linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] vm: Add an tuning knob for vm.max_writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1252167496.2291.15.camel@castor>
Date:	Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:18:16 +0100
From:	Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, chris.mason@...cle.com,
	david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] vm: Add an tuning knob for vm.max_writeback_mb

On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 14:26 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > I've been testing this & it works pretty well here, but setting 
> > max_writeback_mb to 128 seems much too large for normal desktop machines.
> > 
> > Because it is so large the background writes don't stop when they get 
> > down to the background threshold, but just keep on writing. 
> > background_threshold on my machine is only about 300Mb so it can 
> > undershoot by quite a bit. This could impact random write workloads 
> > significantly.
> 
> If that's true, would it be even worse for embedded devices with, say,
> just 32MB RAM?  It sounds like writeback undershoot might be rather
> extreme in that case.

Well, on a machine that small I don't think it will be any worse. The
current code tries to write 1024 pages so its undershoot will be about
100% anyway. 

> Also on this topic, should max_writeback be smaller for slow disks?  I
> have a small device here with a hard disk that can only be written at
> 2-10MB/s due to limitations of the built-in IDE controller.
> 
> I know that's unusual, but it shows there is quite a wide range of
> speeds at which disks can be written, even just counting hard disks.
> 
> -- Jamie

I'm not sure about that, it will depend on how the background threshold
issue gets fixed.

regards
Richard
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/