[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19106.59719.36991.788931@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 00:42:15 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's
testsuite
Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I'm testing this and the pty_write() fix on i686 and ppc64 now.
> >
> > Sometimes the bug is difficult to trigger, so I may need to do loads of
> > testing with different gcc versions before I dare to say that it's fixed.
>
> Ok, I'm going to commit the two patches, because even if there is some
> other bug hiding too (and it doesn't fix your thing - although I think it
> will), this is definitely a real fix regardless.
>
> And I want to do a -rc9 and let it get a couple of days of testing, since
> I got way more pull requests than I hoped for while I was off diving.
With these two fixes my i686 box finished all gcc bootstrap/regtest
cycles I had scheduled with no signs of pty errors. My ppc64 box
isn't done yet, but so far it's not seen any errors either. So I'm
reasonably optimistic about these fixes.
/Mikael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists