[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090907080403.5e4510b3.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:04:03 +0900
From: Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [mmotm][BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: fix softlimit css refcnt handling(yet
another one)
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:07:26 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:37:58 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:40:50 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > Ah, one more question. What memory.usage_in_bytes shows in that case ?
> > > > If not zero, charge/uncharge coalescing is guilty.
> > > >
> > > usage_in_bytes is 0.
> > > I've confirmed by crash command that the mem_cgroup has extra ref counts.
> > >
> > > I'll dig more..
> > >
> > BTW, do you use softlimit ? I found this but...Hmm
> >
> No.
> I'm sorry I can't access my machine, so can't test this.
>
>
> But I think this patch itself is needed and looks good.
>
I've found the cause of the issue.
Andrew, could you add this one after KAMEZAWA-san's
memory-controller-soft-limit-reclaim-on-contention-v9-fix-softlimit-css-refcnt-handling.patch ?
===
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
refcount of the "victim" should be decremented before exiting the loop.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ac51294..011aba6 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1133,8 +1133,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
* anything, it might because there are
* no reclaimable pages under this hierarchy
*/
- if (!check_soft || !total)
+ if (!check_soft || !total) {
+ css_put(&victim->css);
break;
+ }
/*
* We want to do more targetted reclaim.
* excess >> 2 is not to excessive so as to
@@ -1142,8 +1144,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
* coming back to reclaim from this cgroup
*/
if (total >= (excess >> 2) ||
- (loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS))
+ (loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS)) {
+ css_put(&victim->css);
break;
+ }
}
}
if (!mem_cgroup_local_usage(&victim->stat)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists