[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909061413.43683.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:13:43 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10 update 2x] PM: Measure suspend and resume times for individual devices
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Thanks Rafael, the code looks a lot more natural IMHO.
> 
> this bit:
> 
> > +#ifdef DEBUG
> > +static void dbg_get_time(struct timeval *start)
> > +{
> > +	do_gettimeofday(start);
> > +}
> 
> is a plain wrapper over gettimeofday so you might want to inline 
> it. (although GCC will do it too most of the time)
I have a rule of not using 'inline' except for in headers.  In this case,
however, it's almost like a header, so I'll follow your suggestion.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
