[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090907090441.GB4717@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:04:41 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, npiggin@...e.de
Subject: Re: linux-next: slab tree build failure
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:43:46AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Aah, let me guess, CONFIG_SLQB? I guess I'll just rebase the damn tree
> and make it non-default. We need that anyway if we want to merge it to
> 2.6.32. I'll take a stab at it later this evening (my time zone).
Will SLQB be merged during the next merge window? Just realized that s390
doesn't boot with CONFIG_SLQB (crashes before the console is active).
I tend to ignore bugs which seem to be related to SLQB in linux-next,
but if it gets merged I might need to look deeper into this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists