linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] Gigaset driver patches for 2.6.32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AA4CD64.4070501@imap.cc>
Date:	Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:07:48 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
	Hansjoerg Lipp <hjlipp@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Gigaset driver patches for 2.6.32

Daniel,

thanks for taking a look at my patches.

On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:26:46 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> patches 6,7,10, and 12 all have checkpatch errors. Could you fix those? 

I have reissued patch 7, exchanging the "static" and "inline" keywords
as requested.

The other patches I'd much prefer to keep as they are. The "ERRORs"
checkpatch.pl reported for them are results of keeping to the existing
formatting of the patched files. Completely reformatting them would
cloud the actual changes made by the patches.

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (255 bytes)