linux-kernel - Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AA4FE4E.7000402@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:36:30 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, kernel@...ivas.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	efault@....de, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and
 measurements

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'd really encourage everyone to test these things yourself 
> as well and not take anyone's word on this as granted. The more 
> people provide numbers, the better.

Besides mean values from bandwidth and latency focused tests, standard 
deviations or variance, or e.g. 90th percentiles and perhaps maxima of 
latency focused tests might be of interest.  Or graphs with error bars.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =--= --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/