[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA631AA.6000803@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:27:54 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] writeback: get rid of generic_sync_sb_inodes() export
Hi Jens,
On 09/08/2009 12:23 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> int i, err;
> struct ubifs_info *c = sb->s_fs_info;
> - struct writeback_control wbc = {
> - .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
> - .range_start = 0,
> - .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
> - .nr_to_write = LONG_MAX,
> - };
>
> /*
> * Zero @wait is just an advisory thing to help the file system shove
> @@ -462,7 +456,7 @@ static int ubifs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> * the user be able to get more accurate results of 'statfs()' after
> * they synchronize the file system.
> */
> - generic_sync_sb_inodes(sb,&wbc);
> + sync_inodes_sb(sb);
This call is unnecessary and I've removed it and the patch is sitting in
linux-next for long time:
http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git/commit/887ee17117fd23e962332b353d250ac9e090b20f
Stephen e-mailed about the conflict recently. Could we please resolve the
conflict? I guess if you pick up my patch then git will be able to resolve
stuff automatically.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists