[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0909072138340.13297-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
cc: alan@...ux.intel.com, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNINGs in usb-serial.c
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> OK, here's the debug output with the info. Looks like the
> destroy_serial() is called via serial_open().
>
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_install
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_open - port 0
> serial_open = 1
...
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_open - port 0
> serial_open = 2
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_tiocmset - port 0
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_ioctl - port 0, cmd 0x5401
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_ioctl - port 0, cmd 0x5404
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_chars_in_buffer = port 0
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_set_termios - port 0
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: serial_open - port 0
> Pid: 5007, comm: pppd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc8-gkh-00038-g37d0892-dirty #42
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810687bb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
> [<ffffffffa01cc532>] ? destroy_serial+0x0/0x10e [usbserial]
> [<ffffffffa01cc54a>] destroy_serial+0x18/0x10e [usbserial]
> [<ffffffffa01cc532>] ? destroy_serial+0x0/0x10e [usbserial]
> [<ffffffff8116ddbd>] kref_put+0x43/0x4f
> [<ffffffffa01cb0e3>] serial_open+0x11b/0x188 [usbserial]
You're right; serial_open() is somehow calling usb_serial_put().
But in my version of the code there's no way for that to happen. Could
it be that your version is different from mine? For comparison, here
is my copy of serial_open().
Alan Stern
static int serial_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
{
struct usb_serial_port *port = tty->driver_data;
struct usb_serial *serial = port->serial;
int retval;
dbg("%s - port %d", __func__, port->number);
spin_lock_irq(&port->port.lock);
if (!tty_hung_up_p(filp))
++port->port.count;
spin_unlock_irq(&port->port.lock);
tty_port_tty_set(&port->port, tty);
/* Do the device-specific open only if the hardware isn't
* already initialized.
*/
if (!test_bit(ASYNCB_INITIALIZED, &port->port.flags)) {
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&port->mutex))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
mutex_lock(&serial->disc_mutex);
if (serial->disconnected)
retval = -ENODEV;
else
retval = port->serial->type->open(tty, port);
mutex_unlock(&serial->disc_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&port->mutex);
if (retval)
return retval;
set_bit(ASYNCB_INITIALIZED, &port->port.flags);
}
/* Now do the correct tty layer semantics */
retval = tty_port_block_til_ready(&port->port, tty, filp);
return retval;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists