[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908135536.GD15974@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 09:55:36 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com, paolo.valente@...more.it,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, jmoyer@...hat.com, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, agk@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, jmarchan@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V9
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:14:06AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Here is the vanilla kernel and V9 comparision.
>
> Normal Read | Random Read | Normal Write | Random Write
>
> vanilla(Avg of 3 times) 67580 KiB/s 3540 KiB/s 61964 KiB/s 9823 KiB/s
>
> V9(Avg of 3 times) 68954 KiB/s 3567 KiB/s 60654 KiB/s 9858 KiB/s
>
> Performance +2.0% +0.7% -2.1% +0.3%
>
Thanks Gui. So that's lot of improvements from previous versions. I remember
you were noticing 7% regressions in buffered write performance.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists