linux-kernel - Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:47:25 -0700
From:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
To:	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Serge
Belyshev<belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi. I've done measurments of time taken by make -j4 kernel build
> on a quadcore box.  Results are interesting: mainline kernel
> has regressed since v2.6.23 release by more than 10%.

Is this related to why I now have to double the amount of threads X I
pass to make -jX, in order to use all my idle time for a kernel
compile?  I had noticed (without measuring exactly) that it seems with
each kernel released in this series mentioned, I had to increase my
number of worker threads, my common working model now is (cpus * 2) in
order to get zero idle time.

Sorry I haven't tested BFS yet, but am interested to see if it helps
interactivity when playing flash videos on my dual core laptop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/