[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908184229.GA5956@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:42:29 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Make sure data stored into inode is properly seen
before unlocking new inode
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> In theory it could happen that on one CPU we initialize a new inode but clearing
> of I_NEW | I_LOCK gets reordered before some of the initialization. Thus on
> another CPU we return not fully uptodate inode from iget_locked().
>
> This seems to fix a corruption issue on ext3 mounted over NFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Looks good to me. Impressive that this causes real life issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists