[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA6AB52.8070206@arcor.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:06:58 +0300
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@...or.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@...oulu.fi>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On 09/08/2009 02:35 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@...or.de> wrote:
>
>> [...] That would mean that you (or anyone else with an interest of
>> tracking this down) would follow the examples given (by me and
>> others, like enabling desktop compositing, firing up mplayer with
>> a video and generally reproducing this using the quite detailed
>> steps I posted as a recipe).
>
> Could you follow up on Frederic's detailed tracing suggestions that
> would give us the source of the latency?
I've set it up and ran the tests now.
> ( Also, as per lkml etiquette, please try to keep the Cc: list
> intact when replying to emails. I missed your first reply
> that you un-Cc:-ed. )
Sorry for that.
> A quick look at the latencytop output suggests a scheduling latency.
> Could you send me the kernel .config that you are using?
That would be this one:
http://foss.math.aegean.gr/~realnc/kernel/config-2.6.31-rc9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists