linux-kernel - Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AA6AFCE.5080406@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:26:06 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>
CC:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

On 09/08/2009 03:20 PM, Serge Belyshev wrote:
> Jeff Garzik<jeff@...zik.org>  writes:
>
>> You will almost certainly see idle CPUs/threads with "make -jN_CPUS"
>> due to processes waiting for I/O.
>
> Just to clarify: I have excluded all I/O effects in my plots completely
> by building completely from tmpfs. Also, before each actual measurment
> there was a thrown-off "pre-caching" one.  And my box has 8GB of RAM.

You could always one-up that by using ramfs ;)

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/