[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501F0F6A8@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:34:55 -0700
From: "Anirban Sinha" <ASinha@...gmasystems.com>
To: "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>, "Anirban Sinha" <ani@...rban.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Dario Faggioli" <raistlin@...ux.it>
Subject: RE: question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us
>Maybe. Short term hack. My current thoughts on the subject, after
some
>testing, is that the patchlet should just die, and pondering the larger
>solution should happen.
Just curious, what is the larger solution? When everyone adapts using
control-groups?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists