[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908193752.GH9013@mothafucka.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:37:52 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] keep guest wallclock in sync with host clock
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:41:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:34:57AM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > KVM clock is great to avoid drifting in guest VMs running ontop of kvm.
> > However, the current mechanism will not propagate changes in wallclock value
> > upwards. This effectively means that in a large pool of VMs that need accurate timing,
> > all of them has to run NTP, instead of just the host doing it.
> >
> > Since the host updates information in the shared memory area upon msr writes,
> > this patch introduces a worker that writes to that msr, and calls do_settimeofday
> > at fixed intervals, with second resolution. A interval of 0 determines that we
> > are not interested in this behaviour. A later patch will make this optional at
> > runtime
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
>
> As mentioned before, ntp already does this (and its not that heavy is
> it?).
>
> For example, if ntp running on the host, it avoids stepping the clock
> backwards by slow adjustment, while the periodic frequency adjustment on
> the guest bypasses that.
Simple question: How do I run ntp in guests without network?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists