[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908032254.GJ8315@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:52:55 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
Cc: riel@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com, agk@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nauman@...gle.com,
guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, jmoyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:
> I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post
> dm-ioband to the mailing list.
>
> - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate
> limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if
> a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy.
> - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by
> using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain.
> - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
> advantage.)
But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists