[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908220943.GJ6753@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:09:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd Kconfig output..
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:06:14AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> Saw this while doing a 'make oldconfig' moving from -mmotm0827 to -mmotm0903:
>
> RCU Implementation
> > 1. Tree-based hierarchical RCU (TREE_RCU)
> 2. Preemptable tree-based hierarchical RCU (TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) (NEW)
> choice[1-2]: ?
>
> There is no help available for this kernel option.
> Prompt: RCU Implementation
> Defined at init/Kconfig:329
> Location:
> -> General setup
> -> RCU Subsystem
> Selected by: m [=m]
>
> Where did that 'Selected by:' come from? Or is that just an artifact of
> the way Kconfig implements 'choice'?
Many of the architectures use a "select" clause for RCU, usually
selecting CLASSIC_RCU. Could that be the issue?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists