linux-kernel - Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <873a6xdqwq.fsf@depni.sinp.msu.ru>
Date:	Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:15:33 +0000
From:	Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

Serge Belyshev <belyshev@...ni.sinp.msu.ru> writes:
>[snip]

I've updated the graphs, added kernels 2.6.24..2.6.29:
http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/7029/epicmakej4.png

And added comparison with best-performing 2.6.23 kernel:
http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7563/epicbfstips.png

>
> Conclusions are
> 1) mainline has severely regressed since v2.6.23
> 2) BFS shows optimal performance at make -jN where N equals number of
>    h/w threads, while current mainline scheduler performance is far from
>    optimal in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/