[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AA6D8D0.9050509@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:21:04 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm: follow_hugetlb_page flags
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> follow_hugetlb_page() shouldn't be guessing about the coredump case
> either: pass the foll_flags down to it, instead of just the write bit.
>
> Remove that obscure huge_zeropage_ok() test. The decision is easy,
> though unlike the non-huge case - here vm_ops->fault is always set.
> But we know that a fault would serve up zeroes, unless there's
> already a hugetlbfs pagecache page to back the range.
>
> (Alternatively, since hugetlb pages aren't swapped out under pressure,
> you could save more dump space by arguing that a page not yet faulted
> into this process cannot be relevant to the dump; but that would be
> more surprising.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists