[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908225349.GA19524@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:53:49 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] increase rcutorture intensity and fix a
couple resulting bugs
This patch series increases the intensity of rcutorture testing for
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and provides fixes for a couple resulting bugs.
o Make rcutorture's RCU read-side critical sections occasionally
spin for a few tens of milliseconds, which greatly increases
the probability that they will be preempted and that quiescent
states will be forced. Yes, this does uncover some bugs in
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU (though TREE_RCU passes with flying colors).
o Fix a bug where rnp->gpnum was not being updated. This
increases TREE_PREEMPT_RCU's reliability considerably, though
bugs still remain.
o Make the initialization of multi-node trees of rcu_node
structures unconditionally acquire rnp->lock. This simplifies
the code a bit and will make it easier to allow grace-period
initialization become preemptable, should this be needed.
Next steps include applying review comments, adding expedited grace
periods, and chasing down remaining bugs. Longer term, RCU priority
boosting.
b/kernel/rcutorture.c | 16 +++++++++-------
b/kernel/rcutree.c | 7 +++++--
kernel/rcutree.c | 42 ++++++++++++------------------------------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists