[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090908065355.GB6505@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:53:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf trace: Add filter support
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:06:49AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > >> An example:
> > >>
> > >> #./perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:irq==18:record
> > >> or
> > >> #./perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:irq==18 -R
> > >> ^C
> > >
> > > We may want to write complex filters. While looking at this patchset,
> > > that seems possible this way, but the raw line may become unreadable:
> > >
> > > perf record -f -e irq:irq_handler_entry:"irq==18 && (name == 'foo' || bar == 'blah')":record
> > >
> > > May be we should add an option to let one also set the filters seperately then
> > > we could do:
> > >
> > > perf record -f -e -R irq:irq_handler_entry --filter "irq==18 && (name == 'foo' || bar == 'blah')"
> > >
> >
> > I had the same idea. ;)
> >
> > But using this option, is it possible to specify different filters
> > for different events? like this:
> >
> > perf record -f -e -R irq:irq_handler_entry --filter "irq==18"
> > -e irq:softirq_entry --filter "vec==1"
> >
>
>
> Exactly how I was imagining it :)
Yes, that looks like a nice syntax. First the event, then the
conditions that restrict its output.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists