linux-kernel - Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	nbd@...nwrt.org, mingo@...e.hu, mb@...sch.de, kernel@...ivas.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:28:22 +1000

>> The TLB is SW loaded, yes. However it should not do any misses on kernel
>> space, since the whole segment is in a wired TLB entry.
> 
> Including vmalloc space ?

No, MIPS does take SW tlb misses on vmalloc space. :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/