[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:07:45 -0700
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"pv-drivers@...are.com" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"Chetan.Loke@...lex.Com" <Chetan.Loke@...lex.Com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA - V3.
Hi all,
Thanks for taking another look. I have addressed all of Eike and Bryan's
comments except the host_lock one, see below for details.
Also I have rolled out a v4 patch with all the changes, which I will
send out separately.
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 14:52 -0700, Brian King wrote:
> Alok Kataria wrote:
> > +
> > +struct pvscsi_adapter {
> > + char *mmioBase;
> > + unsigned int irq;
> > + u8 rev;
> > + bool use_msi;
> > + bool use_msix;
> > + bool use_msg;
> > +
> > + spinlock_t hw_lock;
>
> Why not just use host_lock in the scsi_host structure?
>
I agree with Chetan here, lets keep these locks separate.
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Map all data buffers for a command into PCI space and
> > + * setup the scatter/gather list if needed.
> > + */
> > +static void pvscsi_map_buffers(struct pvscsi_adapter *adapter,
> > + struct pvscsi_ctx *ctx,
> > + struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, PVSCSIRingReqDesc *e)
> > +{
> > + unsigned count;
> > + unsigned bufflen = scsi_bufflen(cmd);
> > + struct scatterlist *sg;
> > +
> > + e->dataLen = bufflen;
> > + e->dataAddr = 0;
> > + if (bufflen == 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + sg = scsi_sglist(cmd);
> > + count = scsi_sg_count(cmd);
> > + if (count != 0) {
> > + int segs = pci_map_sg(adapter->dev, sg, count,
> > + cmd->sc_data_direction);
>
> Should use scsi_dma_map here instead.
Done.
> > + if (segs > 1) {
> > + pvscsi_create_sg(ctx, sg, segs);
> > +
> > + e->flags |= PVSCSI_FLAG_CMD_WITH_SG_LIST;
> > + ctx->sglPA = pci_map_single(adapter->dev, ctx->sgl,
> > + SGL_SIZE, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> > + e->dataAddr = ctx->sglPA;
> > + } else
> > + e->dataAddr = sg_dma_address(sg);
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * In case there is no S/G list, scsi_sglist points
> > + * directly to the buffer.
> > + */
> > + ctx->dataPA = pci_map_single(adapter->dev, sg, bufflen,
> > + cmd->sc_data_direction);
> > + e->dataAddr = ctx->dataPA;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pvscsi_unmap_buffers(const struct pvscsi_adapter *adapter,
> > + struct pvscsi_ctx *ctx)
> > +{
> > + struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
> > + unsigned bufflen;
> > +
> > + cmd = ctx->cmd;
> > + bufflen = scsi_bufflen(cmd);
> > +
> > + if (bufflen != 0) {
> > + unsigned count = scsi_sg_count(cmd);
> > +
> > + if (count != 0) {
> > + pci_unmap_sg(adapter->dev, scsi_sglist(cmd), count,
> > + cmd->sc_data_direction);
>
> Use scsi_dma_unmap here instead.
Done.
>
> > + if (ctx->sglPA) {
> > + pci_unmap_single(adapter->dev, ctx->sglPA,
> > + SGL_SIZE, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> > + ctx->sglPA = 0;
> > + }
> > + } else
> > + pci_unmap_single(adapter->dev, ctx->dataPA, bufflen,
> > + cmd->sc_data_direction);
> > + }
> > + if (cmd->sense_buffer)
> > + pci_unmap_single(adapter->dev, ctx->sensePA,
> > + SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> > +}
> > +
>
>
Thanks,
Alok
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists