[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:19:34 +0200
From: Pavol Cvengros <pavol.cvengros@...meinteractive.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4+quota+nfs issue
On 9/9/2009 4:46 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 09-09-09 11:42:03, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
>> [ adding relevant CCs ]
>>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Pavol Cvengros wrote:
>>
>>>> recently we have build and started to use raid storage with formatted
>>>> capacity of 4.5T (ext4 formatted, default params).
>>>> FS has quota turned on and is exported via NFS to nodes.
>>>> If we turn qouta on on this FS and are trying to use it over NFS we get the
>>>> following:
>>>>
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> WARNING: at fs/quota/dquot.c:964 dquot_claim_space+0x181/0x190()
>>>> Hardware name: S3210SH
>>>> Modules linked in: nfs fscache nfsd lockd auth_rpcgss exportfs sunrpc
>>>> coretemp hwmon ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom uhci_hcd floppy
>>>> usbcore i2c_i801 i2c_core processor 3w_9xxx button thermal
>>>> Pid: 268, comm: pdflush Tainted: G W 2.6.30-gentoo-r3_host #1
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> [<ffffffff803151e1>] ? dquot_claim_space+0x181/0x190
>>>> [<ffffffff80245c59>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x89/0x100
>>>> [<ffffffff803151e1>] ? dquot_claim_space+0x181/0x190
>>>> [<ffffffff80367e83>] ? ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x423/0x440
>>>> [<ffffffff8036c05f>] ? ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x2cf/0x460
>>>> [<ffffffff80360a17>] ? ext4_ext_find_extent+0x307/0x330
>>>> [<ffffffff80362508>] ? ext4_ext_get_blocks+0x578/0xfc0
>>>> [<ffffffff8028e828>] ? __pagevec_free+0x48/0x70
>>>> [<ffffffff803a1c65>] ? blk_rq_bio_prep+0x35/0x130
>>>> [<ffffffff8034d310>] ? ext4_get_blocks_wrap+0x210/0x380
>>>> [<ffffffff8034d8d8>] ? mpage_da_map_blocks+0xe8/0x750
>>>> [<ffffffff80292cee>] ? pagevec_lookup_tag+0x2e/0x50
>>>> [<ffffffff8029084c>] ? write_cache_pages+0x11c/0x400
>>>> [<ffffffff8034e500>] ? __mpage_da_writepage+0x0/0x190
>>>> [<ffffffff8034e269>] ? ext4_da_writepages+0x329/0x4b0
>>>> [<ffffffff80290bd2>] ? do_writepages+0x32/0x70
>>>> [<ffffffff802e4140>] ? __writeback_single_inode+0xb0/0x490
>>>> [<ffffffff8023c753>] ? dequeue_entity+0x23/0x1c0
>>>> [<ffffffff802e4b16>] ? generic_sync_sb_inodes+0x316/0x4f0
>>>> [<ffffffff802e4f4e>] ? writeback_inodes+0x5e/0x110
>>>> [<ffffffff80290e56>] ? wb_kupdate+0xc6/0x160
>>>> [<ffffffff80292110>] ? pdflush+0x120/0x230
>>>> [<ffffffff80290d90>] ? wb_kupdate+0x0/0x160
>>>> [<ffffffff80291ff0>] ? pdflush+0x0/0x230
>>>> [<ffffffff80261154>] ? kthread+0x64/0xc0
>>>> [<ffffffff8020d13a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
>>>> [<ffffffff802610f0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0
>>>> [<ffffffff8020d130>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
>>>> ---[ end trace cb54e6523e9ab60d ]---
>>>>
>>>> fstab entry:
>>>> /dev/sdb1 /mnt/storage ext4
>>>> noatime,nodiratime,usrjquota=aquota.user,grpjquota=aquota.group,jqfmt=vfsv0
>>>>
>>>> qith quotaoff on tihs FS, warnings stop.
>>>>
>>>> Question is if it's safe to use quotas with this problem (warning) or not.
>>>> Can't afford data damage.
>>>>
> The warning definitely doesn't directly indicate a danger of data loss.
> But there *is* some bug causing that ext4 asks for more quota space than
> it has reserved.
> From your report it seems it is easily reproducible, right? Do you have
> an easy way to trigger this warning - by some test script or so?
>
> Honza
>
really easy to reproduce, our storage is on live production so I can't
experiment with kernel but it's enough to do quotaon and system will get
"spammed" with these warning on every file access..
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists