linux-kernel - Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1252565738.7205.29.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:55:38 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:20 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> One thing I also noticed is that when I have logged in, I run xmodmap
> manually to load some keymappings (I always tell myself to add this to
> the log in scripts, but I suspend/resume this laptop for weeks at the
> time and forget before the next boot). With the stock kernel, xmodmap
> will halt X updates and take forever to run. With BFS, it returned
> instantly. As I would expect.

Can you provide a little more detail (I'm a xmodmap n00b), how does one
run xmodmap and maybe provide your xmodmap config?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/