[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090910070443.GC29009@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:04:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:20 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > One thing I also noticed is that when I have logged in, I run xmodmap
> > > manually to load some keymappings (I always tell myself to add this to
> > > the log in scripts, but I suspend/resume this laptop for weeks at the
> > > time and forget before the next boot). With the stock kernel, xmodmap
> > > will halt X updates and take forever to run. With BFS, it returned
> > > instantly. As I would expect.
> >
> > Can you provide a little more detail (I'm a xmodmap n00b), how
> > does one run xmodmap and maybe provide your xmodmap config?
>
> Will do, let me get the notebook and strace time it on both bfs
> and mainline.
A 'perf stat' comparison would be nice as well - that will show us
events strace doesnt show, and shows us the basic scheduler behavior
as well.
A 'full' trace could be done as well via trace-cmd.c (attached), if
you enable:
CONFIG_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER=y
and did something like:
trace-cmd -s xmodmap ... > trace.txt
Ingo
View attachment "trace-cmd.c" of type "text/plain" (6542 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists