[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1252570722.4876.23.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:18:42 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, Assaf Krauss <assaf.krauss@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@...el.com>
Subject: Re: iwlagn: order 2 page allocation failures
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:55 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:59:30PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 September 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Franz, in the full dmesg was there any mention of "SLUB: Unable to
> > > allocate memory on node"?
> >
> > No, nothing at all. I double checked the kernel log, but it was completely
> > quiet in the hours before and after the messages I already posted.
> >
>
> Ok, that in itself is unexpected.
>
> Pekka, it looks from the stack trace that the failure is from
> __alloc_skb and I am guessing the failure path is around here
>
> size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info),
> gfp_mask, node);
> if (!data)
> goto nodata;
>
> Why would the SLUB out-of-memory message not appear? It's hardly
> tripping up on printk_ratelimit() is it?
That's because it's a large allocation that's passed directly to the
page allocator. See kmalloc_large_node(), for example.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists