linux-kernel - Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090910094547.GB18599@kernel.dk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:45:47 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> trace.txt attached.

Now it really is, I very much need a more clever MUA to help me with
these things :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


Download attachment "trace.txt.bz2" of type "application/octet-stream" (241339 bytes)