[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090910100945.GG18599@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:09:46 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > I went to try -tip btw, but it crashes on boot. Here's the
> > backtrace, typed manually, it's crashing in
> > queue_work_on+0x28/0x60.
> >
> > Call Trace:
> > queue_work
> > schedule_work
> > clocksource_mark_unstable
> > mark_tsc_unstable
> > check_tsc_sync_source
> > native_cpu_up
> > relay_hotcpu_callback
> > do_forK_idle
> > _cpu_up
> > cpu_up
> > kernel_init
> > kernel_thread_helper
>
> hm, that looks like an old bug i fixed days ago via:
>
> 00a3273: Revert "x86: Make tsc=reliable override boot time stability checks"
>
> Have you tested tip:master - do you still know which sha1?
It was -tip pulled this morning, 2-3 hours ago. I don't have the sha
anymore, but it was a fresh pull today.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists