[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090910212837.GA31459@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:28:37 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mikew@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][v6][PATCH 8/9]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall
Arnd Bergmann [arnd@...db.de] wrote:
|
| I wonder if we can avoid spreading copies of this function across
| all architectures.
|
| Would it be possible to define it like this?
Since this is a variant of clone() and clone is listed as a PTREGSCALL(),
I pass in the pt_regs.
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S lists clone() under this comment:
/*
* System calls that need a pt_regs pointer.
*/
Is there a guideline on what system calls use/need pt_regs ?
Thanks,
Suakdev
|
| asmlinkage long
| clone_with_pids(int flags, unsigned long child_stack_base, int __user *parent_tid_ptr,
| int __user *child_tid_ptr, struct pid_set __user *pid_setp)
| {
| if (!child_stack_base) {
| struct pt_regs *regs;
|
| regs = task_pt_regs(current);
| child_stack_base = user_stack_pointer(regs);
| }
|
| return do_fork_with_pids(clone_flags, child_stack_base, 0,
| parent_tid_ptr, child_tid_ptr, pid_setp);
| }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists