[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1252654659.7126.2.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:37:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gautham Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] resend, cpuset/hotplug fixes
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 15:15 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> I have different concept. cpuset_cpus_allowed() is not called at atomic
> context nor non-preemptable context nor other critical context.
> So it should be allowed to use mutexs. That's what I think.
It hardly does any work at all, so why bother with a mutex?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists