[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909111747.40238.strakh@ispras.ru>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:47:39 +0000
From: iceberg <strakh@...ras.ru>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix lock imbalances in /drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
On Thursday 10 September 2009 15:30:03 you wrote:
Incorrect patch. See path starting with "if (cam->sensor == null) {" in line
1960. In this case we goto out_smbs and try mutex_unlock on unlocking mutex.
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:37:34 +0000
>
> iceberg <strakh@...ras.ru> wrote:
> > In ./drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c, in function cafe_pci_probe:
> > Mutex must be unlocked before exit
> > 1. On paths starting with mutex lock in line 1912, then continuing in
> > lines: 1929, 1936 (goto unreg) and 1940 (goto iounmap) .
> > 2. On path starting in line 1971 mutex lock, and then continuing in line
> > 1978 (goto out_smbus) mutex.
>
> That's a definite bug, but I hate all those unlocks in the error
> branches. As it happens, we don't really need the mutex until the
> device has been exposed to the rest of the kernel, so I propose the
> following as a better patch.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out,
>
> jon
>
> ---
> Fix a mutex leak
>
> Certain error exits from cafe_pci_probe() can leave the camera mutex
> locked. For much of the time, we didn't need the mutex anyway; take it out
> and add an unlock in the path where it is needed.
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Strakh <strakh@...ras.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> ---
> drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c index c4d181d..0f62b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> @@ -1909,7 +1909,6 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> goto out_free;
>
> mutex_init(&cam->s_mutex);
> - mutex_lock(&cam->s_mutex);
> spin_lock_init(&cam->dev_lock);
> cam->state = S_NOTREADY;
> cafe_set_config_needed(cam, 1);
> @@ -1949,7 +1948,6 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> * because the sensor could attach in this call chain, leading to
> * unsightly deadlocks.
> */
> - mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex); /* attach can deadlock */
> ret = cafe_smbus_setup(cam);
> if (ret)
> goto out_freeirq;
> @@ -1991,6 +1989,7 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> return 0;
>
> out_smbus:
> + mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);
> cafe_smbus_shutdown(cam);
> out_freeirq:
> cafe_ctlr_power_down(cam);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists